<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>a public defender - Latest Comments in Glenarlow Wilson wins state Habeas and State appeals | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://apublicdefender.disqus.com/glenarlow_wilson_wins_state_habeas_and_state_appeals_a_public_defender/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:22:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Glenarlow Wilson wins state Habeas and State appeals | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/06/11/glenarlow-wilson-wins-state-habeas/#comment-3730179</link><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote comment="1969"]Gideon,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the clarification on that.  it does make sense.[/quote]&lt;br&gt;No problem. I'd still like to see the opinion and the notification of grounds for appeal to make up my mind, but that's my best guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gideon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:22:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glenarlow Wilson wins state Habeas and State appeals | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/06/11/glenarlow-wilson-wins-state-habeas/#comment-3730176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gideon,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the clarification on that.  it does make sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:50:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glenarlow Wilson wins state Habeas and State appeals | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/06/11/glenarlow-wilson-wins-state-habeas/#comment-3730174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm thrilled to have voted for Thurbert Baker in the last election.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Audacity</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:16:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glenarlow Wilson wins state Habeas and State appeals | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/06/11/glenarlow-wilson-wins-state-habeas/#comment-3730180</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Karoli, I wish I could answer that. I have had similar cases where the state has decided to pursue an appeal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The stay is automatic and pretty universal. The Connecticut Practice Book provides that there will be an automatic stay  in criminal and non-criminal matters when an appeal is taken.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suspect the State is appealing the habeas court's restructuring of the sentence. Typically, a habeas court cannot modify a sentence, but only vacate it. The only case in which a habeas court can impose a new sentence is if the claim was a breach of plea agreement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, I have not personally dealt with 8th Amendment claims, so I have little idea of the ideal remedy in such cases.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gideon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:05:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glenarlow Wilson wins state Habeas and State appeals | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/06/11/glenarlow-wilson-wins-state-habeas/#comment-3730171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gideon,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CNN is reporting that the prosecutor filed for an appeal and a stay of his release from jail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why are they so entrenched about this?  Is common sense completely discarded in favor of law and order?  Isn't there a place for both?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:56:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>