<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>a public defender - Latest Comments in Julie Amero granted new trial | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://apublicdefender.disqus.com/julie_amero_granted_new_trial_a_public_defender/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:14:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Julie Amero granted new trial | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/06/06/julie-amero-granted-new-trial/#comment-3730146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It can be very hard to get rid of some of these. I recall a search toolbar someone foolishly installed which took me two hours to stamp out and needed more than one tool and several reboots. I have 30 years experience with computers and their support - I doubt Ms Amero has as much.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Voice of Sanity</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:14:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Julie Amero granted new trial | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/06/06/julie-amero-granted-new-trial/#comment-3730143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. There was some major goof up here. At least the conviction has now been overturned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to how this happened, my best guess is that the prosecutor himself wasn't too well versed in malware and did what he thought was best: stick by the jury's verdict and the testimony of his "expert".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gideon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Julie Amero granted new trial | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/06/06/julie-amero-granted-new-trial/#comment-3730144</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This whole prosecution is absolutely ludicrous. On its face, and while not literally impossible, the notion that she sat there in a classroom checking out the hardcore porn is silly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is almost certainly a malware/browser hijack issue. Any rank-amateur computer hobbyist would've been able to discover the malware/browswer hijacker causing the porn popups with a few simple and free anti-malware/spyware tools. I've done it dozens and dozens of times myself on friend's and work computers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So how could this have gotten this far? Do we have a Nifong in Connecticut?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Kunckle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:02:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Julie Amero granted new trial | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/06/06/julie-amero-granted-new-trial/#comment-3730145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Be sure to see the Hartford Courant article by &lt;a href="http://www.courant.com/news/local/hcu-amerotrial-0606,0,4739321.story?coll=hc-headlines-home" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.courant.com/news/local/hcu-amerotrial-0606,0,4739321.story?coll=hc-headlines-home"&gt;Rick Green&lt;/a&gt;, who has some interesting tidbits.  Seems the judge wasn't all that happy about bloggers' reactions to the verdict. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:30:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>