<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>a public defender - Latest Comments in Pro se per se | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://apublicdefender.disqus.com/pro_se_per_se_a_public_defender/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:14:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pro se per se | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/10/31/pro-se-per-se/#comment-3733583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone know if the U.S. DOJ is looking into this for civil rights violations?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark in Jersey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:14:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pro se per se | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/10/31/pro-se-per-se/#comment-3733584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When will prosecutors and judges who violate the canons so blatantly go where they send others?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Voice of Sanity</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:10:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pro se per se | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/10/31/pro-se-per-se/#comment-3733585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Appalling.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SPO</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:40:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>