<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>a public defender - Latest Comments in Serious Proposed Changes to DUI Statute | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://apublicdefender.disqus.com/serious_proposed_changes_to_dui_statute_a_public_defender/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:08:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Serious Proposed Changes to DUI Statute | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/04/16/serious-proposed-changes-to-dui-statute/#comment-3729785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I certainly have to agree that much of this bill seems excessive - and is far more aggressive than any current UK legislation.  However, in the UK we also have significant problems with both drink and drug drivers re-offending.  You would have thought that one DUI is enough, but this doesn't seem to teach a clear enough lesson.  I suppose it is a matter of whether this bill will be put into practice and whether the tougher penalties have a deterrent effect... I suspect it will be more of a revenue earner than a deterrent.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anti DUI Breathalyzers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:08:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serious Proposed Changes to DUI Statute | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/04/16/serious-proposed-changes-to-dui-statute/#comment-3729784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The more I read this, the more appalled I am. I can't believe this piece of legislation was voted out of committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While you're right that the focus of the legislation probably was the criminal penalties, the administrative penalties are extremely severe and should not be enforced.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We can only hope that this dies on the floor.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gideon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:13:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serious Proposed Changes to DUI Statute | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/04/16/serious-proposed-changes-to-dui-statute/#comment-3729783</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So many things wrong with this bill. The car forfeiture, the inability to challenge probable cause. Ugh.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gideon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:03:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>