<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>a public defender - Latest Comments in Will SCOTUS engage in profanity? | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://apublicdefender.disqus.com/will_scotus_engage_in_profanity_a_public_defender/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:10:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Will SCOTUS engage in profanity? | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/03/will-scotus-engage-in-profanity/#comment-3733600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Modesty becomes you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gideon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:10:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will SCOTUS engage in profanity? | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/03/will-scotus-engage-in-profanity/#comment-3733599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You might like this&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://randazza.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/cybernet-trademark-matter-uspto.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://randazza.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/cybernet-trademark-matter-uspto.pdf"&gt;http://randazza.files.wordp...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc J. Randazza</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:04:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will SCOTUS engage in profanity? | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/03/will-scotus-engage-in-profanity/#comment-3733598</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, but I was shooting for minimialist emphasis&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:03:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will SCOTUS engage in profanity? | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/03/will-scotus-engage-in-profanity/#comment-3733603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Barely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gideon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:54:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will SCOTUS engage in profanity? | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/03/will-scotus-engage-in-profanity/#comment-3733602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was in there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:49:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will SCOTUS engage in profanity? | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/03/will-scotus-engage-in-profanity/#comment-3733601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone has to stand up to the tyranny and say the word. If it wasn't going to be you, it had to be me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gideon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:52:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will SCOTUS engage in profanity? | a public defender</title><link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/03/will-scotus-engage-in-profanity/#comment-3733604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Potty mouth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:47:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>